f4mi telegram
f4mi telegram
alright, let me know i i made any mistakes BUT: WINS: AM34 limits scanning to known CSAM only (passed by just 1 vote). AM36 protects E2E encryption. AM35 requires judicial authorization for targeted scanning. MAJOR WIN SINCE THAT MEANS NO INDISCRIMINATE MASS SUREVEILLANCE FOR NOW LOSSES: AM35 (judicial pre-auth) rejected. AM30 (alternative known-only text) rejected. AM29 passed, extends the interim regime to 2028, giving more runway than expected to the surveillance crowd NEUTRAL: AM33, AM31, AM32 procedural date/recital tweaks, no privacy impact RISK: AM34 survived by a single vote. Trilogue with the Council, which still wants permanent, untargeted mass scanning, could gut it. The April 3 expiry deadline hands the Council a pressure lever. This is the strongest anti-Chat Control stance any EU institution has taken. E2E encryption is safe across the board. The real fight now is trilogue: keeping "known CSAM only" alive against a Council that wants to scan everything.